So, I got to thinking about the hunt for Bin Laden. And I started realizing that:
#1, Bush has not mentioned him much at all.
#2, Bush has not seemed to put much effort into finding him either.
My thought is that Bush needs him alive as an antagonist. If we captured or killed Bin Laden then Bush’s “Global War on Terrorism” would lose it’s steam rather quickly.
Voters would shift from thinking about security and start asking about other issues. This would mean the Republican juggernaut would lose most of it’s steam.
Of course it’s losing power just based on public opinion, but what other explaination can really account for the fact that he is still at large?
You must be logged in to post a comment.
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
39 queries. 1.059 seconds